Pickelle It’s no secret that the real-world application of many new technologies often doesn’t measure up to the expectation, especially when that technology is touted as the solution to a significant problem facing an industry or segment.

A notable exception, however, has been teleradiology. The levels of productivity and connectivity enhancements that this technology has brought to the field of diagnostic imaging have been so impressive that most practices cannot imagine existing without its inclusion in the modality mix.

I recently discussed with one radiologist the notion that teleradiology is now considered a wide area network for his total practice offering—not a novelty item. It is considered one of the primary weapons that this particular practice uses in its quest for the perfect balance of service and quality.

Consider the fact that highly trained and competent technologists can staff today’s imaging center, and that images can be fed directly to the staffed radiology department elsewhere. The convenience and responsiveness to both the patient and referring physician is significantly enhanced with teleradiology, adding a measure of access that only a few short years ago was unheard of.

In this issue of Medical Imaging, we examine state-of-the-art teleradiology, its impact on the profession, the current product offerings, and some interesting applications. As we have with each issue of MI, our editorial content evaluates the impact of technology on the imaging industry. It is our mission to discuss and analyze the critical connections between the consultative role of the physician in diagnosis and the role that the equipment and services can play in supporting this all-important discipline.

Also, we’ve compiled our yearly preview of products, technologies, and services that will be on display at the annual Health Information Management Systems Society (HIMSS) conference as they relate to radiology. The coverage starts on page 38. Of course, we’ll also be sending our editorial staff to the show in order to investigate the important stories about this segment devoted to medical informatics. Among the technologies that we expect to see are those that support and expand the offerings of teleradiology into the entire enterprise, connecting the radiology information system to the hospital information system as well as the roles that these systems both play in managing the busy institution or practice.

Undoubtedly, there will be a bit of hype at the conference, but then again, no discussion of technology would be complete without at least some hoopla. In the case of products that are designed to communicate more effectively between diagnostic physicians, technologists, referring physicians, insurers, and patients, I am certain that we will find some products that are worthy of your consideration—just as teleradiology has most recently been.

Curtis Pickelle
Group Publisher, Medical Imaging
President, MWC